◆ SpookStack

ARGUMENT 1-WHETHER, This appeal should be reversed, because the trial judge,William D.Stiehl,did willfully and knowingly combine, conspire,confederate and agree with Appellees and other div- erse persons,;names are to Appellant unknown,to use and abuse its office and power of the United States,in violation of Art- icles. III § I and IV § 2 of the Constitution,Section 2 of the Thirteenth Amendment,by aiding and abating a coverup to con- ceal Class A Felony Crime(S) committed,and day-by-day being committed by United States Courts en banc District and Appe- llate for the Eastern and Western District of Missouri,such as 18 USC 8 § 1,2,3,4,241,242,1001,1961,1962,1963,2071,2073, 2075,2076,28 USC §§ 453,455 et seq.,Dismissing this [ P-A-I-D v-H-R-E&S Civil Rights Complaint(S) W-I-T-H P-R-E-J-U-D- I-C-E, blocking Clerk from issuing Summonses presented to Clerk,and over 1,000 Copies of Complaints were prepared ? Indisputable Facts: For over Twenty one(21) consecut- ive Years the Federal district Court Eastern District of Miss- ouri,;en bane has committed the crimes set forth above,and in the three Complaints listed on Defendant/Judge's single order copy attached to Notice of appeal,all of which fully incorpor- ated herein,and the crimes set out above [ With Impunity ] What these officers of the court/Appellees herein ongoing crimes to coverup and conceal,a falsely manufactured convict-— ion over Appellant in June 1976,imprisoned him for Ten(10) Consecutive Years, and keep him on federal parole for Eight(8) Consecutive,and for the past Twenty one(21) Consecutive Years -4-