◆ SpookStack

oO Q ¥.1995); United States vs.First Midwest Bank, 94-C-7365, 1995, WL 447762(N.D.ILL.1995),affidavit(S) Motions and Mem- os disregarded,no responses from officers of the court.While Appellant were still receiving returned summonses, judge did dismissed the complaint with-prejudice,and heretofore neith- er the court or the office of the U.S.Attorney responded to Appellant petition pursuant to 28 USC § § 2241,2242 and 2243. 2.0n appeal to Eighth circuit,again Appellant Paid all costs and fees;served all appellees,to have Eighth Circuit court en bane affirmed district judge's fraudulent dismissal with-prejudice,without opinion,and prior to Appellees date for filing response briefs,Appellant prepared and copied over Six Hundred (600) copies of petition for. writ of certiorari, and copies of Joint Appendices, totalling over 2000 pages each and all served upon Appellees,in Jones vs.William H. Rehnquist,Chief Justice,et al.supra., but prior to mailing ten(10) copies each of petition and Joint Appendices to clerk of Supreme Court,that court did knowingly issued a fraudulent opinion that does set forth wall to wall Falsely Unsupported L-I-E(S) against the character of Petition’ and his quest for Justice,Distorted and Lied about facts.See now pending in this Court,on appeal Sylvester Jones vs.United States Supreme Court et al.,No.96-3263, conspiracy by Justices to Block Pet— ition and Joint Appendices in Jones vs.Rehnquist,et _al.Supra. 3.After district court en bane issued two(2) Fraudulent Ors/injunctions against Appellant both without jurisdiction supporting evidence,making the court liable under Stump vs. -§-