◆ SpookStack

O O of 42 USC § 1986,Article III § I of the Constitution, 28 USC § § 453, and 455 et seq.,the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.See Complaint for further [Class A Felony Crime(S) knowingly and Willfully Committed by Just- ices of U.S.Supreme Court] Acting in concert and Par- ticipation with Appellees herein,every member of the media named herein were furnished at Appellant expense indisputable evidence establishing guilt on the part of Defendants,beginning with 60 minutes in 1983 up: to 1996 all Appellees were served with copies of Petiti- ons in the above mentioned cases,e.g., Jones vs.ABC Television Network,et al.Supra., and Joint Appendic- rather than bring these facts to the American's peo- ple,conspired with Defendants/Appellees federal jud- ges to coverup and conceal these crimes. The federal District Court en banc eastern district of Missouri did corruptly issued two(2) en banc or- ders,one June 17,1988 and the other 1995 directing its clerk,not to accept [ $120.00 Filing Fees ] from Appellant,rather return Checks and pleadings to him, forever denying to him access to federal court and as stated in the en banc order access to any State court.Further federal district court en banc,with Catherine D.Parry,issued order to all U.S.Marshals, { to arrest Appellant on each occasions he comes into the Courthouse Building,Without Warrant or Probable cause,detain him,debrief him,as to his bus- iness,and follow him until he leaves the building, that order has been active now over one year,July 1996 U.S Marshals arrested- Appellant simple. because he came into the federal Courthouse building,taken him to the marshal's office,threatened him with jail,and demanded that Appellant not talk to them,further den- ied him right to call his attorney,and marshal Brock that were during all the talk,informed Appellant that the same will happen whenever he comes into the cour- ' thouse building,Appellant further [ Humiliated by marshal Brock ordered another marshal to follow App- ellant to the menroom. A Complaint were submitted to clerk,Robert D.St.Vrain,appellee herein against the marshals,were stumped received June 5,1995 heretofore not filed,and Appellant barred from Paying filing fee,Complaint entitled: Jones vs.Floyd A.Kimdrough, U.S.Marshal,et al., Over one year held unfiled by clerk of district court,So what district court,has jurisdiction over these cases ? involving all three Branches of the Federal Government ? CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ~5-