◆ SpookStack

O O The U.S.Supreme Court has routinely held that federal offic- ers must obey the law,In Butz vs-Economou, 438 US 478,57 L Ed 2a 895,98 S Ct 2894 at 2910(1978),"No man in this country is so high that he is above the law." No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity,All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest,are creatures of the law,and are bound to obey it." See also O'Shea vs.Litteton,supra., 414 US at 503 said: "Judges who would willfully Discriminate on the grou- nd of Race or otherwise would willfully Deprive the citizen of his constitutional rights...M-U-S-T take +t-account of 18.U.S.C § .242..." But Defendants crimes has went further than § 242,rather 18 uSC 8 8 1,2,374,241,242,1961,1962,1963,2071,2073,2075,2976, Title 15 USCA by conspiring with private Corporations such as Sharp Electronics Corp.,to sanction by judicial opinion [B]illin(S)] of Dollars Sharp has and now day by day Extort— ing Citizens/Consumers of the United States out of .Supreme Court held--in Dinnes. vs.Sparks,449. US 24,66 L Ed 2d 185,101 S Ct 183(19800 as it held in O'Shea,that judicial immunity was not designed to insulate the judiciary from all aspects of public accountability.Judges are subject to criminal pro- secutions as are other citizens.See further in City of Los Angeles vs.Lyons,461 US 95,75 L Ed 2d 675,103 S Ct 1660(1983) That anyone suffered an injury barred by the Federal Constit- ution,he has a remedy for damages,and that those who deliber- ately deprive a citizen of his Constitutional Rights "Risk Conviction under the federal criminal laws."See further Pull~ iam,Magistrate vs-Allen, 466 US 522,80 L Ed 2d 565,104 S Ct -6-