◆ SpookStack

O O 1970(1984),Our;"...interpretations of the Civil Rights Acts by this Court acknowledge Congress' intent to Reach uncons-— titutional actions by all actors including judges." Number(2) District judge,William D.Sriehl's conspiracy to knowingly bypass Rule 58 and Rule 52 See Notice of Appeal for citations, supporting authorities.District judge Must make findings of fact and conclusions of law,and Must be satisfi- ed "Beyond Dounbt" that the Plaintiff can prove no set of fac- ts which would entitle him to relief.See Conley vs.Gibson,355 US 41 at 45-46(1957), and Pro Se Complaints must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers,and as a unanimously held by the Court: "...a pro se complaint "'however;inartfully pleaded must he held to less stringent standards that form- er pleadings drafted by lawyers'" and can only be dismissed for failure to state a claim if it appea- rs "'Beyond Doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief." See Estelle -vs.Gamble, 429 US 97 at 106,50 L Ed 2d 251,97 S Ct 285 at 292(1976),here,district judge,did not ordered this case transferred to another district,rather unconstitutional- ly dismissed it [ With-Prejudice ] attempting to continue the coverup and to bar any future filing against these Appellees. In Berger vs.United States, 295 US 78 at 81(1935) the Court said:"Section 269 of the Judicial Code,as amended(28 U,S.C. § 391 provides: "'On the hearing,of any appeal,certi- uorari,writ or error,or motion for a new trial,in any case civil or criminal,the court shall give judqment after an examination of the E~N-T-I-R-E record before the court Without regard to technical errors,defects or exceptions which do not affect the substantial rights of the parties.'" -7-