◆ SpookStack

oO Oo failure of District Judge,WilliamD.Stiehl to follow Federal Rules Civil and appellate Procedurals,Rule 52 civil Proced- ural requires district judge to make findings of facts and conclusions of Law,Did Discriminated against Appellant on the bases of his race,Class and because he were Pro Se with- out the aid of attorney,under 28 USC § 1654.And to further shield Appellees from Impeachment Trials,Removal from office Criminally Prosecuted and Imprisoned as other citizens of the United States of America ? Rule 52(a) Fed.R.Civ.P.,the trial judge shall explicitly state findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which the judge bases the judgment,order.The requirement that judge ma- ke. findings of fact and conclusions of law is mandatory, The findings must be sufficient to indicate the factual basis for the ultimate conclusion,Liddell vs.Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, 20 F3d 326(8th Cir.1994,although not add- xessing all the. evidence presented as herein,Leaque of United Latin American Citizens,Council No.4424 vs.Clements,986 F 2d 728(5th Cir.1993). PROCEEDINGS COVERED BY RULE 52: Rule 52 requires findings of fact and conclusions of law in non-jury trials,trials with advisory juries,Transmatic,Inc.vs-Fulton Industries,Inc., 53 F 3d 1270(Fed.cir.1995),here,despite Appellant demanded jury trial,case sua sponte dismissed with-prejudice without jury. But Rule 52 does apply to motions for summary judgment under Rule 56,motions under Rule 12(b),Souza vs.Pina, 53 F 3d 423 (1st Cir.1995,such as to dismiss,including use of trial judge. -~15—