◆ SpookStack

0 oO It is no excuse for judge,Stiehl not: due findings of fact,and conclusions of law,except a rush to judgment,in order to cov- erup and conceal crimes committed by Appellees herein,courts must make findings of fact and conclusions of law,if ruling on motion for a preliminary injunction,Bootmen's Frist Nati- onal Bank of Kansas City vs.Kansas Public Employees Retirem- ent System, 57 F 3d 638(8th Cir.1995). FAILURE TO MAKE FINDINGS: The Appellate Court may vacate and remand if trial court's findings of fact are insufficient. Hatahley vs.United States, 351 US 173,76 S Ct 745,100 L Ed 2d 1065(1956),or the Appellate Court may direct the judge to order a new trial,Andre vs.Bendix Corp., 774 F 2d 786 at 781 (7th Cir.1985).Or decide the appeal on the record,if possible Consolidated Aluminum Corp.vs.Foseco Intern,Ltd., 910 F 2a 804 at 814(Fed.Cir.1990).However,the record here,callis for Im- peachment removal from office,criminally prosecuted and impri- ‘soned, trial judge;and all Appellees. in- which judge,Stiehl did conspired therewith and acted in furtherance of the agreement. FORM: The findings of fact may be a separate document or may be included in the opinion,or orally on the record.If here, the court made separate findings or findings at all,then on appeal those findings control over any contradictory factual statements in the opinion.Snow Machines, Inc.vs.American Gay Lesbian and Bisexual Group of’ Boston,;Supra.-, INFERENCES: Inferences from the evidence are reviewed under the same standard as any factual finding.United States vs. United States Gypsum Co.,333 US 364,68 S Ct 525,92 L Ed ae -16-