Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 5
Page 32
32 / 77
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES.
No, 820.—Octoser Term, 1933,
The Fairport, Painesville & Eastern) On Writ of Certiorari to
Railroad Company, Petitioner, the Court of Appeals,
VS. Seventh Judicial District
Mayme F. Meredith. of the State of Ohio.
[June 4, 1934]
Mr. Justice SuTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.
Respondent recovered judgment against petitioner upon the ver-
dict of a jury in an Ohio state court of first instance for a per-
sonal injury resulting from a collision at a railroad-highway cross-
ing between an automobile which she was driving and a train of
cars operated by petitioner over its line of railroad. ‘There is
evidence that the train approached the crossing without sounding
the whistle of the engine or ringing the bell so as to give warning
of the train’s approach. There is also evidence which fairly estab-
lishes that as respondent drew near the crossing the train was in
plain view for a sufficient length of time to have enabled respond-
ent, by the use of ordinary care, to see the train, stop and avoid
the collision, and, therefore, that she was guilty of contributory
negligence. Miller v. Union Pacific R. Co., 290 U. 8. 227, 231. The
train was equipped with air brakes, in conformity with the federal
Safety Appliance Act, as amended, U. S. C., Title 45, e. 1, §§ t and
9, and the orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission made
1Section 1, Tt shall be unlawful for any common earrier engaged in inter-
state commerce by railroad to use on its line any locomotiv. engine in moving
interstate traffic not equipped with a power driving-wheel brake and appliances
for operating the train-brake system, or to run any train in euch traffic that
has not a sufficient number of cars in it so equipped with power or train
brakes that the engineer on the locomotive drawing such train can control
ita apeed without requiring brakemen to use the common hand brake for that
purpose,
Section 9. Whenever, as provided in this chapter, any train is operated
with power or train brakes not Icss than 50 per centum of the cars in such
train shall have their brakes used and operated by the engineer of the loco-
motive drawing such train; and all power-braked cars in such train which
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic