Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 7
Page 48
48 / 107
Menorandum for Mr. Rosen - 2-
was a great deal of discusston on this point, particularly as to
what tnstructions could be tssued, It was generaly agreed that it
would be impossibie to attempt to define when a confession should
be used and when not, and that the only safe procedure for the time
being would be for the Department to issue instructions in very
general terms cauttoning United States Attorneys to eramine confessions
with great care before attempting to use them itn evidence. Sweinhaut
stated that he would get in touch with Mr. Tamm when the first draft
“of this circular was ready, ° .
ne eee
d. INSTRUCTIONS TO FBI
Sweinhaut asked specifically what our problems were in
connection with these decisions, I pointed out that as to arratgn-
ments we have been following the dictates of the Statute and taking
individuals in custody before the committing officer immedtately--
and aigea Joilowing tie Department - 's interpretation that the word
tmmediately means as s00n as is practical, depending upon the avatl-
ability of a committing officer. Sweinhaut was of the opinion that
the right of arraignment was merely 4 personal privilege which could
be woived by the accused. He did not think that these decistons went
so far as to hold that arraignment is a duty on the part of the law
enforcement officer which cannot be waived by a subject.
Sweinhaut inquired as to the percentage of cases in which
me secure confesstona, I told him that in the great majority of cur
cases we secure voluntary statements which are of value not only to
Jurntsh leads tn the case, but also as evidence in court. For thta
reason and also due to the problem presented relative to questioning
suspects and subjects prior to arraignment, I told Sweinhaut that the
Bureau is desirous of securing an eariy ezpression of the views of
the Department as to the effect of these decisions on our procedure.
At his.request I also pointed out generally the content of the memo-
randum we aent the Attorney General, and he again requested that he be
furntshed with a copy y of the eame.” If you agree, I will have a copy
prepared for him, - 2 .
ace
Sweinhaut said that he would have to give the matter con-
stderable more thought before attempting to tssue any instructions
for the Bureau's assistance, ond indicated that in the meantime the
Bureau will have to carry on with the already established procedures.
He also tndicated that it would probably be necessary to have addi-
tional conferences on this subject in the future.
Resp ectsully,
, ee
vw
Se
a
ao. aa
Fe:
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic