◆ SpookStack

Declassified Document Archive & Reader
Log In Register
Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Supreme Court — Part 17

130 pages · May 11, 2026 · Document date: Jan 4, 1968 · Broad topic: General · Topic: Supreme Court · 129 pages OCR'd
← Back to feed
UA * ee Lf Court against Marshall - The Jencks Case John Marshall, Chief Justice of the United States during 37 formative years, the founder of the original Supreme Court tradition, is the victim in this case. Jencks v US 353 US 657. The Court quoted Marshall in support of the ruling to aid Jencks. It pulled a few sentences out of context and to rule contrary to the Marshall ruling,as fully explained later in this story. Jencks was president of one of the Mine, Mill and Smel- - ters unions. To have important statutory privileges for the union, Jencks made an affidavit that “he was not on April 2, 1950, a member of the Communist Party or affiliated with such Party." (p. 659). He was convicted for false swearing inmaking such affidavit. The conviction was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeal. Then the Supreme Court came to his relief. Two of the witnesses for the prosectuion were FBI men operating within the Communist Party. They had been making regular reports to the FBI. This information went into the confidential files of the Justice Department. During the trial the witnesses did not use the files but the lawyers for Jencks demanded their production. The trial judge refused to compel the FBI to produce them. Obviously the files would include much material having no bearing on the Jencks case and which might by disclosure injure many innocent people as well as hamper future surveillance. The opinion stated that the Supreme Court had previously ruled that it was up to the trial judge to decide upon production of such files. (p.668). "This Court held in Goldman v United States, 316 US 129, 132, that the trial judge had discretion to deny inspection---". With no hesitation, it calmly declared the opposite: "We now hold that the petitioner was entitled to an order directing the Government to produce for inspection all reports of ---." The Court made no pretense that any law so required. Instead it just cited "our standards". No-one knows what such "standards" are. The Constitution does not mention.the 265.
OCR quality for this page
Community corrections
First editor: none yet Last editor: none yet
No user corrections yet.
Comments
Document-wide discussion. Follow the Community Standards.
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.

Continue Exploring

Use the strongest next step for this document: continue reading, jump to the topic hub, or move into the matching agency collection.
Continue Reading at Page 107
Jump straight to page 107 of 130.
Reader
Supreme Court — Part 20
Stay inside Supreme Court with another closely related document.
Topic
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the FBI agency landing page for stronger archive context.
FBI
Supreme Court Topic Hub
See the topic overview, related documents, and linked subtopics.
Hub

Agency Collection

This document also belongs in the FBI Documents & FOIA Archive landing page, which is the stronger starting point for agency-level browsing and for searches focused on FBI records.
FBI Documents & FOIA Archive
Open the agency landing page for introduction text, topic links, and more FBI documents.
FBI

Explore This Archive Cluster

This document belongs to the General archive hub and the more specific Supreme Court topic page. Use these hub pages when you want the broader collection context, linked subtopics, and more documents around the same archive thread.
letter bureau
Related subtopics
John Murtha
57 documents · 1471 known pages
Subtopic
Sen Joseph Joe Mccarthy
42 documents · 2653 known pages
Subtopic
D B Cooper
41 documents · 13789 known pages
Subtopic
Kansas City Massacre
38 documents · 5300 known pages
Subtopic
Black Panther Party
36 documents · 3066 known pages
Subtopic
Malcolm X
36 documents · 3932 known pages
Subtopic