Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Supreme Court — Part 17
Page 108
108 / 130
u YY -
fidentHl in their discretion. This is the fact that the
Court withheld in quoting John Marshall (footnote pages —
668, 669).
Marshall refused to order the production of the very
letter referred to in Jenck'’s case quotation. Marshall decided
that the Executive did not have to produce it. Marshall recog-
nized without question the law that all official government
papers were privileged against subpoena by a defendant in a
criminal case,
When he wrote on the subject, Marshall was sitting as a
trial judge on the Aaron Burr treason case. A letter to
the president of the United States was involved. Burr's lawyer
claimed that it was a private letter and therefore not privi-
leged as an official record. The prosecution claimed that it
Was a public paper even though addressed to the President
personally Both sides recognized the law that if it was a
public file,it could not be produced against the will of the
executive.
192)"
"ZF do not think that a privilege does exist to
withhold private letters of a certain description.
The reason is this. Letters to thepresident in his
private character, are often written to him in con~
sequence of his public character and may relate to pub-
lic concerns, Such a letter though it be a private one,
’
esame ta Fake on fho ewharactoear af an afficial nansar And
et Te Ne EL Mae Reta WEE Oe Wer BIC CE Saf ae Saaa Nat he ke ee A Pe eg aks
to be such as ought not be forced into public view ---.
The president may himself state the particular reasons
which may have induced him to withhold a paper, and the
court would unquestionably allow their full force to
those reasons."
Marshall did not order the production even of what appeared on.
its face to be unofficial. He left it to the discretion of the
executive. Thereafter the president sent a copy excepting such
parts as he deemed ought not be made public.
Why the Court chose to use a sentence from the revered
John Marshall to rule in effect opposite John Marshall
remains a judicial mystery if not a judicial disgrace. One
other little mystery is the final twist the Court gave to
t+ha Tae abe ase
LHe WEelnaoS Cdoeec.
967.
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
letter
bureau
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic