◆ SpookStack

Memo to Mr. Callahan Re: Surreptitious Entries the bulky exhibits were missing. This is correct. In all, there were nine exhibits unaccounted for and no notation made on the green sheet as to their disposition. It is possible, however, that some of this material was sent to the FBI Laboratory and not returned following processing. Nevertheless, it was explained in New York that under ordinary procedures material photographed would be processed in New York and negatives would be maintain in the actual pertinent bulky exhibit. For record purpgses the following exhibi were missing: : noted to the Agent who was serving in a liaison capacity with him that some of 1B3 (1) - 5/16/72 Negative of photos tz on 4/4/72. Received on 4/4/72 by 8 7 1B3 (6) - 7/6/72 Two rolls af — Received 5/5/72 by 1B3 (10) - 1/11/73 1B3 (12) - 2/21/73 Two rolls af negatives received 2/13/73 SA 9/18/71. es ~ bo = an _ a he, «J mh — tg in] = i= an sa, ry fe] ee a | iso exhibits apparently were ohtai ned as . ‘Assuming thatthe descriptite dag tromatatig there is a posgibility that 133 6) cdmaeivab! entry not accounted for in our reviews asi ; 1B2 (4) - 5/16/72 One negative of seven photos of subject taken on : wl