◆ SpookStack

KC 77-6303 Representatives, Washington, D. C. September 21, 1950". On page 18 of this report appears a list of the officers of the Hational Lavyers' Guild, and the nase THURGOOD MARSHALL appears 85 an Executive Board member under the caption York City. Exhibit 3, “Guide to subversive organizations and -: - publications dated May 14, 1951, and released by the Committee on Un-American Activities, U0. S. House of Representatives, Washington, D. C.: House document #137", This document cites the National Lawyers’ Guild and the International Juridical Association as Communist front organizations. Echibit 4, “Investigation of Un-American propaganda activities in the United States, 78th Congress, second session, , On HB. Res. 282, first section, VU. S. Government Printing Office, Washington:44". Page 809 of this exhibit entitled “Exhibit #1, international Juridical Asaociation, 100 Fifth Avenue, New York City”, lists the National Committee of this association which list includes the name THURGOOD MARSHALL, ens ee District Court by Judge ALBERT A, RIDGE in which he upheld the right of THURGOOD MARSHALL to appear as counsel for the plaintiffs and Judge RIDGE overruled the petition of the defendants. On November 10, 1951, the plaintiffs and Mr. THURGOOD MARSHALL, as one of four counsels for the plaintiffs, moved that the defendants motion to strike the name of THURGOOD MARSHALL from the piaintiffs petition and to deny him the privilege of appearing as counsel. in this case be stricken and expunged from the record on the grounds that to allow the motion to remain as part of the official record of this case, although overruled, might possibly prejudice the peraonal integrity, and question the national patriotism of THURGOOD MAESHALL in future litigations in U. 8. District Court, Kansas City, Missouri, and other courts. In a pemorandus entered by Judge RIDGE on December 18, 1951, the motion of MARSHALL and the plaintiffs to strike and expunge from the record defendants wotion to strike the nape THURGOOD MARSHALL from plaintiffs petition and deny his tha nrivileaca of anrearing af eouneal in the came wae overruled. the privilege of app ng 3 a Oe Qt a Fc ntgehne ne ttre aime pte ce anagem MET