Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
American Friends Service Committee — Part 28
Page 97
97 / 149
wun organ until peaceful uses can be found for them would
not make seizure impossible, it would at least make the illegality
of seizure plain to all che world, a fact that would deter any
nation not blatanrly bene on war. Since the United States has
much the largest stockpile and since so far Soviet spokesmen
have shown no interest in safeguards against seizure, perhaps
the United States should not stress this problem in its search
for a “foolproof” plan.
if greater protection is desired, this could be gained at
considerable expense by transmuting existing fissionables into
non-explosive form, so that another long and costly operation
would be required to re-transmute them to their present state.
Conceivably the “denaturing” process would stilf permit some
peaceful uses of che fissionables, but no recent scientific reports
have encouraged hope for this, Another protective measure
might allow control authorities ro set up an international de-
pository under multi-national guards in neutral territory, say
SR MGR aL BOPErOory, sayy
in Eastern Greenland. Under such a plan attempts at seizure |
could be countered by measures rendering the deposited material
inaccessible except after very protracted recovery operations.
The problem of what to do with existing stockpiles is un-
questionably a dificult one—bur aot as difficult as the problem
of producing an atomic bomb,
Inspection = Fortunately, the decision to unite both atomic
and apnventional weapons in a system of controls
has considerably clarified and eased the problem of inspection.
The nations should agree on permanent international inspec-
tion on a continuing basis of both atomic and conventional
armaments, armed forces and afl supporting facilities concur-
rently, This assumes there would be a permanent corps of
trained impartial inspectors attached and responsible to the
control organ for inspection service anywhere in the world.
The inspectorate should be given freedom, within limits defined
by the control organ, to inspect anything at any time and any
place. The minute the control plan goes into effect, inspectors
would proceed to prepared stations where some of them could
remain continuously as observers (but without managerial
authority), others could begin checking declared data, and
still others could begin a systematic survey intended to disclose
32
and verify all important data bearing directly upon a nation’s
milicary potenzial. Iz seems unnecessary to grant to the rnspec-
torate such powers as are not appropriate.or ‘essential to effec-
tive inspection. Problems such as whether aerial photography
should be permitted (which caused Russia to balk in 1947}
are not likely to prove diffcule under a control plan which
extends to all armaments, since military secrecy would no
longer be maintainable.
Inspection would be “permanent” and “continuous” in
the sense that it would be in progress at all times with inspec-
tors assigned at all cimes to some critical spots, such as the
locations of atomic reactors and stockpiles. After the first
inventory is completed, the number of inspectors could per-
PIVEN yy 43 MPA, te Mibee Ga litsy wis Lu
haps be reduced, but with a guarantee that enough would be
on hand to observe critical spots continuously, ro check indices
of related financial, economic and military activities, ta process
data submitted by governmental agencies, and ta make special
investigations on suspicion or complaint. Normal diplomatic
and consular establishments and national intelligence services
could lodge complaints and, as a further precaution, the flow
of imports and exports could be monitored,
The United States has insisted on “permanent” and “con-
tinuous” inspection, but as an addition to a plan for incerna~
tional ownership and management of atomic production
facilities. The Soviet Union has not objected thus far to per-
manent and continuous inspection of Conventional armament,
armed forces and facilities. The two nations, therefore, may
not be as far apart on this point as they have sometimes ap-
peared, except for the ownership principle. Qur proposal would
urge the United States to continue emphasizing the need for
inspection of anything the control organ decides, at any time
and any place, bur would require her to yield the point of inter-
national ownership and management. From the Sovier Union
our proposal would require a willingness to permit the contin-
uing observation of critical spots and freedom io inspect any-
thing the control organ decides, at any time and any place.
Violations and the Velo In the light of the factors de-
scribed at the end of Chaprer I,
it would seem necessary to abandon the proposal that the veto
.
a3
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic