Reader Ad Slot
Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
American Friends Service Committee — Part 28
Page 96
96 / 149
ee eer
production of the atom bomb and other weapons of mass
destruction, and the use of fissionable marerials for peaceful
Purposes only, The problem of timing is undecided; this is
discussed below under ‘Schedule of Arms Reduction.”
Ownership & Management Under che circumstances pre-
of Atomic Facilities viously described, it would
seem wise to abandon the idea
of international ownership and management of the world’s
to hold, manage, license and inspect would have all the prob-
lems of a noa-owning control organ plus countless more, many
of which would contain seeds of discord.
The United States has been the chief proponent of inter-
national ownership of atomic facilides, and adoption of the
above proposal would require her to yield this point. To do
so promptly, we believe, would contribute more co reaching
agreement on the total problem of disarmament than any
L
1 TT 1 ww ' 2
Other Concession tne United States may reasonably De-ex pected
“dangerous” atomic facilities, excepe, perhaps, as the Carnegie
Endowment committee has suggested, where nations may elect
to place their atomic industries under international trust.
: ac AG. and
Future production Must be restricted t quotas denned in
appropriate treaties, with the understanding that permissible
production would be subject to the strictest possible accounting
and inspection. Unlimited non-military research using minor
quantities of nuclear fuel would be permitred in national and
international laboratories with the understanding that interna-
tional laboratory staffs will include representatives of interested
countries, and thar all national laboratories will be subject to
continuing and thorough inspection.
Spokesmen for the West may objecc thac adoption of these
proposals would permit diversion of nuclear fuels and clan-
destine activity in sufficient amounts to give strategic advan~-
tage to an offending nation. That this is a conceivable danger
must be admitted.” Its prevention will depend upon the scale
of production of fissionable material permitted, the competence
of the control organ and its staff, the design of the facilities,
the accounting system, and inspection. Given the will to do so,
we believe sufficient technical and scientific know-how can be
Del uincient feciinical ancy ae BMG now Can DC
found to devise the type of administrative organization and
controls required to insure competence, responsibility, relia-
bility, and dependable indices of compliance. Jf che control
organ is given adequate authority and its staff are competent
and impartial, we fail to see how jt matters whether they
operate as officers of the control organ or as agents of a TVA-
like supra-national authority,
International ownership might conceivably make the cask
of inspecting authorized aromic installations a bit easier. But
an atomic colossus standing astride che world with authority
30
Existing Stockpiles of The existence of large stockpiles of
Fissionable Materials fissionable materials presents 3 new
problem of disarmament planning.
Though potentially valuable at some future time for atomic
power, these materials need only be placed in atomic bomb
cases to render a “peaceful” stockpile a cremendous arsenal for
war, Morcover, the bomb cases can easily be concealed, and
their secret fabrication, though didticult, would be hard to
detect. Huge facilities have been buile to refine uranium ore
and to convert it into fissionables. If cach nation keeps control
of the ambiguously peaceful output of these plants, the cemp-
tation co keep building up these stockpiles will remain,
Vesting the international control organ with legal ticle to
these stockpiles and facilities does not solve this problem if the
stockpiles stay where they can be seized and in such form as
will permit rapid convecsion to bombs. Nor does “strategic
balance,” the solution proposed in the United Nations Majority
Plan, seem practicable any Jonger. This principle would have
distributed atomic stockpiles and “dangerous” facilities among
the nations se that, if ong nation wrongfully seized the stock
piles and facilities inside irs boundaries, the other nations could
legally take over theirs and so promptly nuilify any military
gain co the wrong-deer. But che “balance” chis plan requires
would be meaningful today only if ie were achieved between
the Wese and the East. Ir could be reached only if the United
States were to turn over a large part of its own atomic stock-
pile to Sovier bloc countrics. To expect the United States to
do oe seems neither realistic nor reasonable.
though giving custody of national stockpiles to the
31
re
Bo en
Reveal the original PDF page, then click a word to highlight the OCR text.
Community corrections
No user corrections yet.
Comments
No comments on this document yet.
Bottom Reader Ad Slot
Bottom Reader Ad Slot placeholder
If you would like to support SpookStack without paying out of pocket, please consider allowing advertising cookies. It helps cover hosting costs and keeps the archive free to browse. You can change this choice at any time.
Continue Exploring
Agency Collection
Explore This Archive Cluster
Broad Topic Hub
Topic Hub
federal bureau
letter
Related subtopics
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic
Subtopic