◆ SpookStack

She court reviewed hf compared’ the’ documents rota for the plaintiffs with the unexpurgated documents provided to, the court, and, on April 20, 1976, - @ntered an order approving the deletions. The’ court also held that the i. defendants and Special Agent in Charge Held had produced alll files the court . ts be sealed for possible use ~ = = in any review of the case. ‘ _ - On May 24, 1976, the’ court raled’on the plaintiffs’ april 16, 1976 motion; ‘the court ‘declined to enter an order vacating its February 26, 1976 order, quash- (a April 6, 1977, the plaintiffs concluded their case against the federal _, Gefendants on the’ issue of the Liability of the defendants. No offer of proof |. the’ jury as to the’ federal defendants.’ On April 15, 1977, the court directed a verdict for the federal defendants. ~: © | —— motions for sanctions filed March 30,' 1976, and April 19, 1976, the ‘in ‘camera ° response of Special Agent in Charge Held and other responses of the defendants, and the renewed motion of the plaintiffs and the’.defendants' response thereto, entered its order denying the Plaintiffs' motion for sanctions. carne temeatn + bithnve sere Bite mas te dba mncre ie Adil. MOE detha, (TRL «sree. ‘ ; : ' Qn April 6, 1976, plaintiffs moved for an order vacating the court's February 26, 1976 order, quashing plaintiffs' trial subpoena served on Special Agent in a Charge Held and for leave to issue a further subpoena duces tecum. On the : 7 same date, the court modified its March 25, 1976, order and stated that the ; FBI investigative file on the Black Panther Party need. not be produced to - .. the plaintiffs, but that the court would personally review the file for information relating to the plaintiffs. (Tr. 8000-8003). On April 16, 1976, Speciai Agent in Charge Held filed an Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Vacate the court order and issue a new subpoena duces -‘tecum. On April 27, 1976, Held filed an in camera response. bide shee ’ ‘ bs tk dd de bb he ’ oh hk be — Sday - G - .